Boris Johnson has dismissed claims that the government prioritised animals over people during the Afghanistan evacuation as “complete nonsense”.
The prime minister said Operation Pitting, which saw 15,000 Afghans taken out of the country amid the Taliban takeover, was “one of the outstanding military achievements of the last 50 years or more”.
Mr Raab defended himself during an appearance on Sky News earlier, telling Kay Burley the government did “everything we could” to get vulnerable Afghans out of the country.
One of the claims made in written evidence by Raphael Marshall, a desk officer at the Foreign Office, was that the department “received an instruction from the prime minister” to use “considerable capacity” to help animals leave the country that were being cared for by Nowzad, run by Paul “Pen” Farthing.
“There was a direct trade-off between transporting Nowzad’s animals and evacuating British nationals and Afghans evacuees, including Afghans who had served with British soldiers,” he said.
Asked about this, the PM said: “No, that’s complete nonsense.
“What I can tell you is that Operation Pitting, to airlift 15,000 people out of Kabul in the way that we did over the summer, was one of the outstanding military achievements of the last 50 years or more.
“The role of the Foreign Office, the role of Border Force, everybody involved in it, the Home Office officials, they did an absolutely outstanding job, processing very difficult, very complex claims, incredibly quickly.
“Of course, sometimes decisions took hours longer than we wanted to. But you have to be careful about how you do it.
“It was still an astonishing thing to get 15,000 people airlifted out of Kabul in pretty harrowing circumstances.
“We continue to have the Afghan Resettlement Scheme to help people to whom we owe obligations and who may be leaving Afghanistan in fear of their lives.”
Mr Farthing also hit back at this criticism, saying in a tweet that “not one single British soldier was used to get me or the @Nowzad #dogs & #cats into #Kabul airport”.
Speaking at a regular Westminster briefing with journalists, the PM’s spokesman defended the government’s approach and also said that Mr Johnson’s wife, Carrie Johnson, did not intervene to organise the rescue of animals.
Foreign Office ‘not well-led’
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer described Mr Marshall’s evidence as “devastating testimony” that “lays bare the shambolic incompetence of the government”.
Conservative MP Tobias Ellwood, chair of the Defence Select Committee, told Sky News there are “clearly questions to be asked” about the government’s handling of the Afghanistan evacuation.
“It’s taken a 25-year-old junior civil servant, who was making life and death decisions, to confirm what I think many of us already suspected for a long time: that the Foreign Office was not well-led during this crisis,” he said.
What else has the whistleblower claimed?
Mr Marshall claimed that only 5% of Afghan nationals who applied under one UK scheme received help, and some were murdered after being left behind.
He alleged that Mr Raab “did not fully understand the situation”, was slow to make a decision on cases and asked that they be reformatted “in a well-presented table” before making a decision.
Mr Raab said he did not recognise the 5% figure and rejected claims that junior officials were left to make life or death decisions on evacuations.